A face to a URL
17th Sep 2004
What's just as important as the font face used on a website?
If you're like me, when you hear a new band on the radio you want to know what they look like. Of course you could probably hazard a reasonable guess but that's not very useful or satisfying. The same applies when I've been visiting someone's website on a regular basis and I haven't seen a photo of the author; I want to know what they look like. Same for you? So, in place of a missing photograph I usually cobble together all the details I've collected about this author and build up a picture in my head instead.
A photograph (or lack of) provokes thoughts and feelings, which affects how you read or view someone's site.
After frequent visits to sites like Whitespace, Anne van Kesteren, Asterisk* and Hicks Design among others I saw no photos of the authors. I wanted to know what they looked like! Call it inquisitive, call it perverted!
Take Hicks Design for example: I had formed an image of Jon Hicks: a family man, crafting away in his home studio, occasionally picking his nose, loveable ankle-biters distracting him while he listens to the latest Interpol album LOUD. Only recently did I see a picture of Jon Hicks; and how strangely affecting it was to have my skewed vision of him given a face!
A similar case with Paul Scrivens of whitespace fame: when I first saw a photograph of him I was rather surprised. I'd built up this notion that he was a worldly-wise, middle-aged man (and strangely enough) sporting a white beard (whitespace-whitebeard?). Turned out to be rather different. In fact, if I remember correctly, for one reason or another, there was a fair bit of hoo-ha when Scrivs posted photos of himself. Perhaps everyone else was as intrigued as I was! Interesting to note, these photos (and the insightful comments made at the time) have been taken down from the whitespace site... perhaps they are hidden elsewhere within the 9rules network but I couldn't find them.
Oh... Anne van Kesteren is male... a photograph would probably sort out any confusion there.
In May this year Andrei Herasimchuk put together a great article about combining design and usability, and the article included photographs of the contributors. These photos are as important as the textual content. Design Eye for the Usability Guy featured photoshopped mugshots of Didier Hilhorst, D Keith Robinson (Asterisk*), Cameron Moll and Greg Storey. (All handsome guys, breaking down the stereotypical image of the computer nerd, but that's another topic!). Importantly, having the photos gives the content credence; those words came from a real person, not some shady character that nobody's ever clapped eyes on.
Posting photos can be good and bad, but mostly good.
Here's a different perspective: Biroco recommended a well-written site he'd stumbled across: La Vache Qui Lit. Accompanying his post was a photograph of the author Leslie Winer. This photograph I found alluring and exciting, it had that < cite xml:lang="fr">je ne sais quoi, which was all the impetus I needed to make me read through her entire site. Yes, maybe I'm just a perv.
Another angle completely: the Radio Scotland broadcaster Ali Abbasi, (who very sadly died recently) highlights an interesting case. It was after many years of listening to his traffic announcements (peppered with his awful jokes) that I first saw a photograph of the man. Here's the point: although he had a distinctive accent (a combination of Pakistani and Scottish) it didn't really occur to me that he was part Pakistani until I saw a photograph of him. I presumed he was Scottish. So beforehand, when it didn't occur to me what he looked like, I didn't think twice about his accent; after that the Pakistani twang in his accent stood out like a solitary high-rise block of flats in a city of bungalows.
What does all this mean? No definite one thing or another. For me, knowing what a person looks like before conversing or interacting with them (like reading a website or exchanging email etc.) makes a difference to my mindset. Knowing that the person has some physical attribute that I can relate to helps to bring something more solid, more meritorious to their opinions and theories; it helps me visualise their words coming from their mouth. This author is speaking to me. And when it comes to blogging a photograph makes a big difference; without it, something is missing, so put a face to your URL.
D Keith Robinson talked about the importance of having a good "about" page (and in particular if you have a personal/professional site) including a photograph. Good advice, which he doesn't yet follow himself. View the Asterisk* about page.
Dave Shea set down so me rules for doing your own press photography, which is handy.
What about you? Does a photo make a difference? Truthfully?
As a complement to Cameron Moll's Screen Grab Confab I invite you to divulge who you are and provide a photograph to let everyone know what you look like.
Follow these simple rules:
- use an image tag with alt and title attributes
- make your images 150px by 150px
- include class="photo2" within the img tag
- remember to close your img tags
Comments are now closed
This was posted on 17th Sep 2004.








Jon Hicks said...
You got the scene spot on - just not the face! I resisted putting a photo of my ugly mug on the site for a while. A client of mine convinced me that its reassuring to see a photograph, it lets them know that there is a real person there - especially if all contact is over the interweb.
So is that you at the top there?
Friday 17th September 2004 11.05am
Blair Millen said...
Hi Jon,
Yes, that's me. As you probably noticed I haven't added a photograph to my own "about page" yet, but that's the next step. I'm not photogenic AT ALL so it'll take a more than 30 shots to get one that I'm happy with.
Friday 17th September 2004 11.59am
Rob Mientjes said...
You're lucky. For the redesign of my blog (soon, soon) I'm adding a real about page, and it will sport a smart photo of me and some heroes of mine. Of course, we are unlikely to be switched (wait and you'll know).
I also think it's quite important to have a photo of your own on your site, but for me it's somewhat strange. No one realises how old I am until they ask. But my photos look even younger! So it's not a good choice to do so, but still I will - people like it, as you said.
Friday 17th September 2004 3.55pm
Keith said...
Oh boy Blair, calling us out eh? ;)
You know I do plan on putting a photo on my site, and will post here as well. I just need to get that photo! It's harder than it sounds. I don't want just any photo for my public face. Hell most of the photos I've got of myself are when I'm out partyin' and that's no good!
I've got a professional image to uphold...or something...yeah right, ok, I'm just lazy when it comes to my photo. I'll see if I can't get one this weekend.
Happy now!? ;)
Friday 17th September 2004 7.16pm
Lars said...
I had been meaning to post on this very topic for some time, but couldn't really nail my reasons for wanting to see photos of people, at least not without coming across as superficial or perverse, or both. Well, good to see that you took the bullet for me Blair!
But seriously, you did nail them. It's not just superficality: a photo does add credibility to the content or services offered, particularly for professional sites. Good loks or bad looks doesn't really matter, I think.
And yes, I have a photo of myself on my about page, although I am yet to receive any marriage proposals because of it.
Saturday 25th September 2004 3.55pm
Rob Mientjes said...
Now, finally up and running: my new site. My photos will be up soon.
Oh, and there will be several versions of my photo, if you're so inclined to refresh each time to see them all.
Tuesday 28th September 2004 6.42pm
sil said...
Not to appear too stupid here, but isn't this sort of thing what FOAF is for?
Saturday 6th November 2004 11.16pm
Blair Millen said...
sil,
Nobody has yet had the courage to post an image of themselves though! Maybe it's not too late to start the ball rolling... here's one of me with my eyes open.
When you say "this sort of thing" I assume you are referring to my suggestion that visitors to this site post their photos to let everyone see what they look like? If so, then I disagree that FOAF would be the best technology to use; sites like the foaf project encourage users to post an image of themselves but that's not really what I was hoping to achieve here.
I envisaged a selection of photographs of bloggers and like-minded individuals at a single URL; this would have been an easily accessible and interesting resource.
Sunday 7th November 2004 7.57pm